KATIE Smith has registered a dispute with the Financial Ombudsman Service because her bank was slow to reimburse money after money was fraudulently taken from her account.
An ATM-skimming device at Castle Hill copied her NAB Visa Gold Debit card details when she used one of the bank's ATMs on January 14.
Mrs Smith's and husband Shane's debit cards were refused for transactions the following weekend. She called the bank on January 18.
``They transferred me to the fraud department and told me an ATM-skimming device had been fitted to the machine,'' Mrs Smith said.
``They said my cards were cancelled on the 15th to eliminate any risk but hadn't called me to let me know.''
On January 22 the bank told the couple details from the cancelled card had been used to in attempt to make a $90 transaction in Britain that was declined.
Mrs Smith checked her account and found $100 was withdrawn at 10.27pm on the same day, from a Westpac ATM at Auburn.
The transaction also incurred a $2 fee for printing the account balance and a $2 fee for using a non-NAB ATM.
``I was so angry. These cards had been cancelled,'' Mrs Smith said.
``I spent half an hour on the phone with the fraud department, who told me they couldn't help me because it was an ATM withdrawal, not an offshore transaction. They told me to visit a branch and lodge an electronic dispute form.''
Mrs Smith received a letter from the bank on Monday, which said she was liable for the transaction and would not be reimbursed $104 because the correct PIN had been used .
``But if I couldn't use my card to withdraw money, how could anyone else?'' she asked.
Mrs Smith
was told on Wednesday she may be reimbursed ``as a sign of goodwill'' if she wrote to the bank.
``But I'm not going to accept goodwill, I rightfully deserve the money back,'' she said.
Despite receiving a new card, PIN and letter of card reissue on the same day, ``if someone raided my mailbox, I'd be back to square one'' Mrs Smith has refused to continue banking with NAB.
``I've closed my accounts and am going to change to another bank. I feel extremely let down and violated,'' she said.
A NAB spokesperson said they could not comment on cases which may be under police investigation or that disclose private customer information.
But the bank asked The News for Mrs Smith's name at 4.30pm on Thursday.
At 9am on Friday Mrs Smith found the bank had transferred $100 to her account with the description ``ATM dispute adjustment'.
``It's such poor form,'' Mrs Smith said.
``I'm just dumbfounded and find it quite comical that after all they've put me through they've tried to slip it back into my account and cover their footsteps, without even a phone call .''
A NAB spokeswoman explained the bank's precautions.
``NAB has Proactive Risk Manager monitoring card activity which detects fraud spend within seconds. The card is then blocked and customers contacted immediately, with refunds soon to follow,'' the spokeswoman said. ``In genuine fraud cases, NAB customers will not be liable for any stolen funds or fees and charges incurred during the period when the fraud occurred, as stipulated in the terms and conditions of all NAB cards.''